« September 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30


Kick Assiest Blog
Saturday, 23 September 2006
GOP taking midterm Dems to school
Mood:  chatty
Topic: Columns

Truth is a bitch when you can't hide what you've said...

GOP taking midterm Dems to school

WASHINGTON -- Republicans are opening up a new campaign front in the elections that asks voters to think about who will be running Congress if the Democrats are returned to power in November.

People like House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi who said "I don't really consider ourselves at war" with terrorism, who believes Osama bin Laden's capture will not "make us any safer" and who thinks this election "shouldn't be about national security."

Polls show that most voters do not really know much about what the Democrats would do about Iraq or the war on terrorism because their agenda does not say much about either. Voters know even less about the records and statements of the Democratic leaders who would take over the reins of power if voters put them in charge of the House.

The Republican National Committee and the GOP's congressional campaign committee, who want to correct this knowledge deficit, have begun an educational offensive to do so. It began last week with the first in a series of research papers on Pelosi and other Democratic leaders.

Pelosi, who could become House Speaker and third in line for the presidency, was asked on "Meet the Press" in May about her pledge to hold investigative hearings on the war in Iraq if Democrats took charge.

Could such hearings lead to President Bush's impeachment, moderator Tim Russert asked her. "Well," Pelosi replied, "you never know where the facts take you ..." While President Bush is sharpening his message on terrorism and other issues that are at stake in this election -- and lifting his job-approval polls to 44 percent in the process -- the GOP is looking for ways to remind voters that, like Pelosi, the Democrats' leftist leadership is far outside the nation's political mainstream.

They have been doing just that lately in congressional races where the Republicans are considered vulnerable. Like Indiana's 8th district where Republican Rep. John Hostettler faces challenger Brad Ellsworth, sheriff of Vanderburgh County. The NRCC is running a TV ad there that tells voters: "Here's something to think about. Democrats in Congress believe that your taxes should be higher to pay for their bigger government. They believe wiretapping of terrorist communications violates civil liberties. And Congressional Democrats believe that illegal immigrants should get amnesty. No matter how you slice it, a vote for Brad Ellsworth is a vote to put these Democrats in charge of Congress. But their agenda is just too risky."

This ad in one variation or another is being run in a number of other districts where Republicans are at risk and, if the polls are accurate, with significant success. The ad not only plants doubts in the minds of swing Democrats and independents, it will motivate Republican turnout, too, GOP officials tell me. The RNC research papers that will be churned out for the remainder of this election cycle -- e-mailed to the GOP's vast list of 15 million activists -- will reinforce these ads and provide fodder for other ads to come.

Most of the GOP's dossiers are about Democrats who aren't exactly household names -- people like veteran Rep. Henry Waxman, the ranking Democrat on the House Government Reform Committee. Waxman would become the panel's chairman with full subpoena power to dig into every nook and cranny of government.

Who is Henry Waxman? First and foremost, one of the most partisan, bare-knuckle pols the Democrats have. Earlier this year, he signed a legal brief filed in U.S. District Court that called domestic terrorist surveillance "illegal." He voted to rescind the anti-terrorist USA Patriot Act that Bush says is vital to the war on terrorism. He opposed the $87 billion in funds for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Another target in the RNC's "educational papers" is Florida Rep. Alcee Hastings, an impeached former federal judge whom Pelosi has indicated she would put in charge of the supersecret House Intelligence Committee.

Hastings, who was indicted on charges of bribery, conspiracy and obstruction of justice, was impeached by the House (by a vote of 413-to-3) and removed from the bench in the Senate by a vote of 69-to-26. He later ran and won his seat in a solidly Democratic district.

"That an impeached judge could conceivably become head of the Intelligence Committee I think many Americans would find alarming," RNC spokesman Danny Diaz told me.

But this is a guy who voted against the Patriot Act giving government authorities the tools to protect the country from terrorists in October 2001, just a few weeks after the airline attacks by Islamic fanatics.

Equally alarming is the Democrat in line to chair the House Judiciary Committee: ultra-liberal Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, who has all but called for Bush's impeachment.

This is all pretty outrageous stuff that most Americans will not only find deeply appalling but dangerous. That's why the Republicans are going to make sure that people know who they'd be putting into critical positions of power if they vote to give the Democrats majority control on Nov. 7.

Townhall.com ~ Donald Lambro ** GOP taking midterm Dems to school


Posted by yaahoo_06iest at 11:09 PM EDT
Updated: Saturday, 23 September 2006 11:19 PM EDT
Mom 'properly' jailed for letting baby smoke dope, 9th Circus Court sympathetic ~ 5 year sentence reduced to 2
Mood:  spacey
Now Playing: LIBTARD ''VALUES'' ALERT
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Reuters Photo: The sun shines though the distinctive leave of a marijuana plant in this May 24, 2005 file picture. A Montana mother who allowed her 18-month-old baby daughter to inhale from a marijuana water pipe on several occasions was properly convicted, but should not have to spend five years in jail, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Friday.

Mom properly jailed for letting baby smoke dope

SAN FRANCISCO -- A Montana mother who allowed her 18-month-old baby daughter to inhale from a marijuana water pipe on several occasions was properly convicted, but should not have to spend five years in jail, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Friday.

Jessica Durham was photographed allowing her toddler Michala to suck from a marijuana water pipe, also known as a bong, in 2004 by a friend upset about the activity.

"Ms. Durham allegedly remarked that smoking improved Michala's appetite and left Michala lethargic and mellow - a manner she found consistent with her own experience smoking marijuana," Judge Louis Pollak of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals wrote in summarising the case.

In 2005, a lower court sentenced Durham to five years in prison for unlawful marijuana distribution. She appealed both the conviction and the sentence.

In its ruling on Friday, a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit upheld the conviction but said the sentence exceeded the applicable federal law which calls for punishment of no more than two years in prison.

Yahoo News ~ Reuters ** Mom properly jailed for letting baby smoke dope


Posted by yaahoo_06iest at 9:43 AM EDT
Updated: Saturday, 23 September 2006 10:27 PM EDT
As Economic Mood Rises, So May Prospects of GOP, The Times/Bloomberg Poll
Mood:  chatty
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff

As Economic Mood Rises, So May Prospects of GOP

Americans have become more optimistic about the economy, and President Bush is getting some of the credit, a new Times/Bloomberg poll shows.

As voters say the economy will influence their choices in November more than any other national issue, including the war in Iraq and terrorism, Republicans seeking reelection could benefit.

Consumer confidence fell this summer as gas prices peaked and the housing market weakened, particularly in California. Those polled in July were almost evenly split on the state of the economy, with 49% saying it was doing badly.

Now, however, the optimists outnumber the pessimists by 10 percentage points, with 54% saying the economy is doing well.

"There's a lot of conflicting indicators, but things seem to be cruising along pretty steadily," said respondent David Busch, 38, a sales executive in Redmond, Wash., who describes himself as an independent voter. "We've seen a lot of alarmist talk about housing bubbles bursting, gas prices … that are going to derail the economy, that haven't materialized."

Seven weeks before the midterm elections, the economy remains voters' primary focus. Among registered voters, 32% listed the economy and jobs as the most important election issue, followed by the war in Iraq (21%), immigration (17%) and the war on terrorism (13%).

In follow-up interviews, those polled cited a variety of reasons for feeling better about the economy, including unemployment at a low 4.7% nationally, lower gas prices this month and an interest rate freeze by the Federal Reserve.

That could be good news for Republican candidates, as their party is in power in Washington and may be able to take some credit for the economy.

When the economy is rocky, voters traditionally punish the party in power, said Bruce Oppenheimer, a political science professor at Vanderbilt University in Nashville. But when the economy is doing well, their reactions are more difficult to predict, he said.

"This year it's a little more complex to figure because it's clear that the objective measures of how the economy is doing are not striking everybody equally," Oppenheimer said. For instance, pay is rising for some college-educated professionals, but most workers face wage stagnation, he said.

Though falling gas prices could boost Republican candidates, he said, "the question is, will it be too little too late?"

The Times/Bloomberg poll interviewed 1,517 adults, including 1,347 registered voters, nationwide from Saturday to Tuesday under the supervision of Times Poll Director Susan Pinkus. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Although more than half of those polled still disapprove of Bush's handling of the economy, the proportion of those who approve has risen: 43% said they approved, up from 38% in July.

"Everything seems to be going all right. I don't hear a lot of people complaining that much about the economy…. The Feds have kept the interest rates down, so that will probably help," said Chester "Chet" Kusmitch, 69, a retired union carpenter in Crystal Falls, Mich.

Kusmitch said the president was doing a good job handling the economy. "You can't blame everything on the president, for crying out loud…. A lot of things affect the economy."

Charles Gunnells, 54, a disabled diesel mechanic and registered Republican in Salyersville, Ky., said he had doubts about the economy but thought Bush was doing "about as good a job as anybody else could be doing."

He said his opinion of the president had improved in recent weeks as he watched prices at the gas pump drop. "I feel a lot better about it when I see the prices go down," Gunnells said.

Many of those polled agree -- 26% said high oil prices were the greatest threat to the economy today, far ahead of other factors such as foreign competition (18%) and terrorism (16%).

The average price of gas rose to $3.08 in August before dropping to $2.54 this week, according to the Department of Energy. The dip in oil and gas prices is increasing most Americans' confidence in the economy, said Chuck Williams, dean of the business school at the University of the Pacific in Stockton.

"People see the economy in terms of their daily expenses -- what is it going to cost to pick up their child from day care, what does it cost to buy lunch, what does it cost to fill the tank of their car. And if someone's driving an SUV and it's 100 bucks every time you fill up, that gets your attention," Williams said. "If the price is down by 50 cents a gallon, you notice it."

But he said consumers' optimism was tempered by uncertainty about fuel prices as winter approached and by a weakening housing market on both coasts. Homes are lingering on the market in Phoenix, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., and fewer homes are being built. Last month, new home starts were down nearly 20% from last year and 6% from July, the Commerce Department reported Tuesday.

In the poll, 53% of respondents said they expected home prices to remain unchanged six months from now, and 19% expected prices to drop. Both numbers are up 4 percentage points from June. A quarter of respondents from households earning $60,000 to $100,000 worry their home will lose value during the next six months, the poll shows.

"Six or twelve months ago, pretty much everybody thought housing prices were going to go up," said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group in Pittsburgh. "Clearly people have changed their expectations. A little bit of reality has set in."

Donna Bushby, 41, a part-time office worker, said she was getting nervous about the cost of heating her home this winter in the Chicago suburb of Elmwood Park. She and her husband, a truck driver for United Parcel Service, also worry about the value of their home. Six houses on their street are not selling, and one has been on the market for a year and a half.

The couple earn enough to cover expenses for a family of five but not to save, Bushby said, and consider home equity as savings -- "so if you think of your house going down, that's like your nest egg going down."

Many Americans appear to be stretching to make ends meet around the house. More than half of those polled, 53%, said they had trouble keeping up with rising costs, including 30% of those with household incomes more than $100,000.

"People's paychecks are not going up as much as the prices around us," said Bushby, who is nonetheless optimistic. "Hopefully it's temporary."

Geoffrey Gray Sr., 56, a registered Republican, said that he thought Bush had mismanaged the economy and that he worried about the future. Although Gray's house in Reading, Pa., is paid for and the local market seems unlikely to collapse, he worries about poor families and "the shrinking middle class."

"People are living paycheck to paycheck," he said.

Many of those polled, especially working-class Americans, are unsure about their finances and are postponing major purchases such as cars, vacations and large appliances. Of those polled, 64% said now was not a good time to make major purchases, including 81% of those with household incomes less than $40,000, and 66% of those between $40,000 and $60,000.

"If I do make a big purchase," said Bushby, "it may be a hybrid car."

Financial challenges

Q. Taking into account the cost of living and the amount of money you have to spend, would you say your financial situation right now is good, or bad, or somewhere in between?

Household Income (in thousands)                                            More
                                     All        Less than      $40-      $60-       than
                                                     $40           $60      $100       $100

Good                           38%           13%          42%      53%       72%
Bad                              14              29              6           7            1
In between                    47              56             52         40          25
Don't know                    1                2               -            -            2

Q. How about next year? Do you think your financial situation 12 months from now will be better or worse than this year, or will it be about the same?

Household Income (in thousands)                                                 More 
                                  All        Less than       $40-       $60-             than 
                                                  $40            $60        $100           $100

Better                       36%           28%           32%        50%           42%
Worse                       11              17              11            4                 8
Same as this year       50              51              56           45               49
Don't know                 3                4                1             1                 1

Q. Generally speaking, have your household income and the tax cuts you received in recent years kept up with the rising energy prices and other household costs, or has your household income not been able to keep up with the rising costs?

Household Income (in thousands)                                             More
                                  All          Less than       $40-       $60-        than
                                                   $40             $60        $100       $100

Kept up                     42%            29%           46%       48%        65%
Has not kept up          53               65               50          50           30
Doesn't apply             3                  3                 2            2            3
Don't know                 2                  3                 2            -             -           2

Q. Considering your financial situation, is now an excellent, good, not-so-good or poor time to buy expensive items such as large appliances, video equipment and computers, vacation trips, and automobiles?

Household Income (in thousands)                                              More
                         All            Less than       $40-        $60-               than
                                            $40             $60         $100              $100

Excellent           3%                -                2%           4%                 6%
Good                 20                 9               21             32                  36
Not so good        28                24              34             29                  24
Neither (vol.)     10                 7                8              13                  14
Don't know         4                  3                3               2                    1

Notes: *Polls from 2003-2005 were conducted by LA Times alone

(-) indicates less than 0.5%

(vol.) indicates a volunteered response

Poll results are also available at http://www.latimes.com/timespoll.

How the poll was conducted: The Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll contacted 1,517 adults nationwide by telephone Saturday through Tuesday. Telephone numbers were chosen from a list of all exchanges in the nation, and random-digit dialing techniques allowed listed and unlisted numbers to be contacted. Multiple attempts were made to contact each number. The adult population was weighted slightly to conform with census figures for sex, race, age, education and region. The margin of sampling error for all adults, is plus or minus 3 percentage points. For certain subgroups, the error margin may be somewhat higher. Poll results may also be affected by factors such as question wording and the order in which questions are presented.

rce: L.A. Times/Bloomberg poll
LA Times ~ Molly Hennessy-Fiske **
As Economic Mood Rises, So May Prospects of GOP

Graphic

VIDEO
September 21, 2006

PDF

Bush, Iraq and midterm elections


 

Graphic
September 21, 2006

President Bush

(Mandel Ngan / AFP/Getty Images)
September 21, 2006

Related to this Article
- Bush and GOP Making Gains Among Voters


Posted by yaahoo_06iest at 3:14 AM EDT
Updated: Saturday, 23 September 2006 9:08 AM EDT
Cindy Crawford's 5-Year-Old Daughter Models ~ in Bikini and Topless
Mood:  silly
Now Playing: LIBTARD ''VALUES'' ALERT
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Cindy Crawford's Daughter Models… and Causes Controversy

Days after making news for allegedly using Botox – um, who doesn't in Hollywood? – Cindy Crawford is under fire again today… for letting her 5-yeard-old daughter pose in "suggestive" photos.

Apparently little Kaya struck a pose for Melissa Odabash, who makes stylish spandex (as in bathing suits) the stars love. According to the New York Daily News, one photo was of the little girl topless, peeking over her left shoulder at the camera, with white shorts and a back tattoo." In other photos, she wore a string bikini.

The photos have since been moved into a password protected part of Melissa Odabash's site and will eventually be removed, says a spokesperson for the company.

Cindy's rep downplayed the incident, saying: "Oh my God, that's ridiculous. It's a stick-on tattoo! … Cindy's friends own this company. It was just a fun little photo shoot they did in Malibu one day. Kaya is not modeling."

Faded Youth Blog ** Kaya Crawford's Minimodel Photos

The Daily Blabber ~ Celebrity Gossip ** Cindy Crawford's Daughter Models… and Causes Controversy

A "tramp stamp" (as they are commonly referred to) on her lower back is inappropriate on a child. The pose is suggestive and sexualizes the child. I am sure Cindy doesn't "get it," but most of the hollywood/model types have a very different world view from "ordinary people."

Shades of JonBenét Ramsey...

Origional Story:
NY Daily News ~ Daily Dish & Gossip **
Lotta exposure for Cindy's girl

Also at:
Babyrazzi.com ** Kaia Jordan Gerber
Already Following In Her Mom’s Footsteps

Cindy Crawford's daughter Kaya Jordan Gerber modelling Melissa Odabash's childrens swimwear summer 2006 campaign. --- Live Journal.com ~ Oh No They Didn't - Weird ** Kaya Jordan Gerber


Posted by yaahoo_06iest at 1:42 AM EDT
Updated: Saturday, 23 September 2006 8:28 AM EDT
Dems ''Wary'' of Military Commissions Compromise
Mood:  d'oh
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Democrats "Wary" of Military Commissions Compromise

That's what Reuters says: "U.S. Democrats wary of detainee trials compromise". Yes, I'll bet they're wary--wary of having to take a position between now and November.

Some of them are already denouncing the Republicans' compromise, but I doubt that any Democrat in a tough re-election race will do that. Byron York's analysis of the compromise is still the most coherent one I've seen; I think we've linked to it before, but read it now if you haven't already. One thing is clear: this topic hasn't gone away. There is no consensus on whether the compromise does or does not permit waterboarding of detainees to continue. I read somewhere (I'd link if I could find it quickly) that waterboarding was the interrogation technique that broke every high-level detainee but one. (The one exception, according to that report, was an al Qaeda leader who was taken to see Khalid Sheik Mohammed in his cell, and required no further persuasion.) So whether our interrogators can continue to use this highly effective technique is, I think, a very big deal. Waterboarding is denounced by critics as a form of torture. In fact, though, it is harmless, and we reportedly waterboard our own military pilots to acquaint them with the sensation of drowning after they bail out of an airplane.

"It's OK for our pilots, but too cruel for Khalid Sheik Mohammed!" If that's the Democrats' platform for November, they could be in trouble. No wonder they're wary!

Via Power Line News.
Power Line Blog ~ John Hinderaker ** Democrats "Wary" of Military Commissions Compromise


Posted by yaahoo_06iest at 12:55 AM EDT
Updated: Saturday, 23 September 2006 1:53 AM EDT
Friday, 22 September 2006
House Bill To Require Voter ID, Reps Approve, Dems Disapprove... Naturally
Mood:  chatty
Topic: News

House bill to require voter ID

The House yesterday passed legislation that would require voters to show a valid photo identification in federal elections over the overwhelming objections of Democrats who compared the bill to segregation-era measures aimed at disenfranchising Southern blacks.

The Federal Election Integrity Act was approved on a nearly party-line 228-196 vote. Republicans backed the bill 224-3, with three nonvoters; Democrats opposed it 192-4, with five nonvoters. They were joined in opposition by the House's one independent member.

The bill, which faces an uncertain future in the Senate, is part of a Republican effort to complete before the November elections a package of proposals aimed at curbing illegal immigration and its effects on ordinary Americans.

The so-called "Voter ID" bill, aimed at stamping out voter fraud, would require voters in federal elections to provide picture identification by 2008 and provide proof of U.S. citizenship by 2010. It was among the recommendations made last year by the bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, headed by former President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, and former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, a Republican.

"Effective voter registration and voter identification are bedrocks of a modern election system," they wrote in their final report.

But Democrats, siding with groups that work on behalf of minorities and illegal aliens, called the bill a "modern-day poll tax" and said it would place an insurmountable burden on voters and infringe upon their voting rights.

Rep. Brian Bilbray, California Republican, countered that the real infringement upon voting rights would be allowing fraudulent votes by the dead or illegal "to cancel out legitimate votes."

"That is the violation of the Voters Rights Act that we have not addressed," he told colleagues before the vote.

Democrats, who have long demanded reforms to the federal voting process, yesterday dismissed Republican concerns about voter fraud.

"Show me the examples of the problem you're trying to solve," demanded Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat who accused Republicans of trying to appeal to the "fear and -- yes, perhaps -- the prejudices of people."

A Republican cited a study by Johns Hopkins University that found 1,500 dead people who had voted in recent elections. Mr. Hoyer belittled the study, saying no criminal convictions for voter fraud had been won in any of those cases.

Mr. Bilbray pointed out that such convictions might be obtained if proper identification were required.

"Voter fraud is not something you can come back to after the fraud is committed," he said. "The person who voted for those dead people is long gone by the time it comes up on the record."

Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite, Florida Republican, urged support of the bill because, she said, it would prevent illegal aliens from voting in U.S. elections.

"It's outrageous and inexcusable that voters do not have to show proof of citizenship in order to vote in an election," she said. "Illegal immigrants are populating this country at an unprecedented number, and it is unjust and unfair to citizens of this country that noncitizens should have a hand in electing federal officials."

Rep. Alcee L. Hastings, Florida Democrat, said he's more concerned about discouraging voters than he is about illegals voting.

"Nonparticipation in the election process is more of a problem in this country than noncitizens trying to vote," Mr. Hastings said.

Rep. John Lewis, Georgia Democrat, called the bill a "modern-day poll tax" and charged that the bill "is nothing less than voter suppression."

He also reminded the Republican chamber of its overwhelming support in July for renewing the Voting Rights Act, although many conservatives off Capitol Hill warned that portions of it are no longer necessary.

"Just three months ago, this body passed the reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, admitting the sad fact that voter discrimination is still the reality," said Mr. Lewis, who said requiring identification at the polls is "an attack on the voting rights of millions of Americans."

Across the Capitol in the Senate, Democrats continued to slow-walk legislation approved by the House last week to construct 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. The chamber voted yesterday 94-0 on a procedural motion to take up the bill.

Despite universal approval for taking up the legislation, Democratic leaders refused to grant "unanimous consent" agreements to speed up the process.

Washington Times ~ Charles Hurt ** House bill to require voter ID

Well of course the Democrats opposed this bill. It would take away large numbers of their voting base. Illegal aliens and the dead. Without them, no Democrat could be elected dog catcher.

I don't see how the Dems can claim a law like this would amount to a "poll tax", or disenfranchise anyone who has a legal right to vote in this country.

After all, you have to have a valid ID to cash a check, drive a car, get a library card, and for hundreds of other reasons. Hell, I'm 52 years old, and have to show an ID to buy tobacco or beer at Wal-Mart! So to claim that this law is not fair, etc., is pure smokescreen. It's nothing more than sheer obstructionism. Among other things.

What it will do however, it to make sure that only those who have a legal right to vote, can vote. If you are not legal, then you have no right to vote, it's that damn simple.


Posted by yaahoo_06iest at 12:29 AM EDT
Thursday, 21 September 2006
Libtard Canadian Broadcasting Corp. head quits after defecation, bestiality remarks, ''the joys of bowel movements''
Mood:  d'oh
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

CBC head quits after defecation, bestiality remarks

OTTAWA -- The chairman of the publicly funded Canadian Broadcasting Corp. has resigned after remarks about bestiality and ruminations about defecation, Canadian Heritage Minister Bev Oda said on Tuesday.

Guy Fournier created an uproar in Canada's Lebanese community and in the media when he claimed that Lebanon allowed men to have sexual relations with female animals, but reserved the death penalty for those who did so with male animals.

In comments made in May, and replayed in a CBC weekend interview, he talked at length about the joys of bowel movements.

"He has increasingly lost the confidence of Canada's new government," Oda told the House of Commons. "I inform this House that I have received the voluntary resignation of Mr. Fournier effective today."

Reuters ** CBC head quits after defecation, bestiality remarks


Posted by yaahoo_06iest at 12:21 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 21 September 2006 12:25 AM EDT
Wednesday, 20 September 2006
Comedian: ''I Miss Bill Clinton''
Mood:  chatty
Topic: Funny Stuff

Comedian: "I Miss Bill Clinton"

It doesn't matter what party you belong to - this is hilarious. From a show on Canadian TV. there was a black comedian who said he misses Bill Clinton.

"Yep, that's right - I miss Bill Clinton! He was the closest thing we ever  got to having a black man as President. Number 1 - He played the sax. Number 2 - He smoked weed. Number 3 - He had his way with ugly white women. Even now? Look at him... his wife works, and he don't!  And, he gets a check from the government every month. Manufacturers announced today that they will be stocking America's shelves this week with "Clinton Soup," in honor of one of the nations' most distinguished men. It consists primarily of a weenie in hot water.

Chrysler Corporation is adding a new car to its line to honor Bill Clinton.  The Dodge Drafter will be built in Canada.


When asked what he thought about foreign affairs,  Clinton replied, "I don't know, I never had one."

The Clinton revised judicial oath: "I solemnly swear to tell the truth as I know it, the whole truth as I believe it to be, and nothing but what I think you need to know."

Clinton will be recorded in history as the only President to do Hanky Panky between the Bushes."

--- ya gotta love it!

"Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged."  Ronald Reagan


Posted by yaahoo_06iest at 11:51 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 21 September 2006 12:03 AM EDT
House GOP Has $36 Million for Elections
Mood:  chatty
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff

House GOP Has $36 Million for Elections

The Republican committee working to retain GOP control of the House has $36 million in the bank going into the final stretch of the congressional campaign.

Rep. Tom Reynolds, R-N.Y., the chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said his organization raised $8.5 million last month in a concerted effort to gain a financial edge over its Democratic counterpart.

The money in hand puts the committee $10 million ahead compared to the same period prior to the 2004 election. At a news conference with reporters, Reynolds said the fundraising places his committee ahead of a pace he had set at the start of the campaign.

Democrats need to gain 15 seats in the House on Nov. 7 to take control after a dozen years of Republican rule.

News Max.com ~ Associated Press ** House GOP Has $36 Million for Elections


Posted by yaahoo_06iest at 2:44 AM EDT
Tuesday, 19 September 2006
Dennis Miller Schools Bill Maher on Free Speech and Fox News
Mood:  sharp
Topic: Funny Stuff

Dennis Miller Schools Bill Maher on Free Speech and Fox News

By Noel Sheppard

Well sports fans, the plot is still thickening. TVNewser reported on Monday that a fellow comedian has responded to Bill Maher’s “free speech” rant reported by NewsBusters here and here.

To refresh memories, Maher said on his Friday evening “Real Time” program “if CBS News doesn’t understand what free speech is, what am I supposed to expect of Fox News?” Deliciously, someone who has worked for both HBO and FNC had an answer for Maher:

This morning, comedian and FNC contributor Dennis Miller called TVNewser to respond. "Maher wants to know what to expect of Fox? I can tell him what to expect," he said. "Roger Ailes has never asked me once what I'm going to talk about, or how he'd like me to talk about it. It's completely up to me. Nobody has ever stipulated anything."

It seems that between the executive producer of the CBS “Evening News” denying that Maher was asked not to speak about religion, and Miller’s comments, Mr. Real Time has a bit of egg on his face.

News Busters ~ Noel Sheppard ** Dennis Miller Schools Bill Maher on Free Speech and Fox News
Noel Sheppard's blog | login or register to post comments
Categories: Bill Maher | CBS | CBS Evening News


Posted by yaahoo_06iest at 5:37 AM EDT

Newer | Latest | Older